Are you suggesting we find a technical solution that prevents harm instead of forming a law that only punishes the bad actors after they've done harm? Crazy!
You've got the right idea there. Laws are mostly worthless because they require public support. If people don't support the law, it may just as well be a recommendation. Laws will only be effective as the number of people that abide by them. A law that is supported by only 1% of the people it applies to will only be 1% effective and there isn't a single law that is 100% effective (meaning that law is never broken).
The real solution to stopping censorship of the internet is to make it impossible to censor. An internet that can't be censored is truly free.
You've got the right idea there. Laws are mostly worthless because they require public support. If people don't support the law, it may just as well be a recommendation. Laws will only be effective as the number of people that abide by them. A law that is supported by only 1% of the people it applies to will only be 1% effective and there isn't a single law that is 100% effective (meaning that law is never broken).
The real solution to stopping censorship of the internet is to make it impossible to censor. An internet that can't be censored is truly free.